International News: When the heart beats faster, the smart-ass often stops working. In the intoxication of love, a person plane forgets the difference between right and wrong. Something similar happened with a millionaire merchantry Woman Zhu, a resident of Chongking, China. She sat hearted with an employee working in her own company. But this relationship would prove to be so expensive, she never thought of.
Zhu took such a step to unzip hey, which is still surprised by people on social media. Hey was once married and moreover the father of a child. In order to get his love, Zhu transferred 30 lakh yuan, i.e. well-nigh Rs 3.7 crore, in the name of divorcing his wife and raising the child. The money moreover had an impact and Hey's wife divorced without any drama. Without this, Zhu and Hey started living together.
It's illegal gift & versus social standards : Court
Everything seemed perfect in the early dazzle of love. But as time passed, Zhu realized that there was a deep gorge between him and her well-nigh thinking and lifestyle. The relationship started to be taxed now. A year later, Jhu decided to end the relationship. At the same time, she asked for the money that she had given to the wife of Hey. The matter reached the court, where Initially Zhu got some relief. The lower magistrate said the value was an 'illegal gift' and versus social standards. The magistrate ordered that Hey and his ex-wife should return the money. Zhu felt that now she got justice. But the twist in the story was still left.
Decision overturned in second hearing
Hey and his ex-wife appealed versus the decision. The picture reverted as soon as the specimen reached the upper court. The magistrate said that Zhu could not prove that the money was given directly to the wife as a gift. The magistrate admitted that the value was given for divorce and raising the child.
Not only this, but the magistrate moreover questioned Zhu's intention. The judge said that Zhu misrepresented her economic strength. First she put pressure on divorce but then asked for money without the relationship broke. This policies was neither legal nor moral. As a result, the magistrate reversed the first visualization and unliable the wife to alimony the money.
Zhu trolled on social media
After this decision, Zhu not only lost in the magistrate but was moreover trolled on social media. One user wrote, "First someone's house was wrenched and now you are asking for money back; this is the limit." The other joked, "Marry a handsome man; maybe someday a rich woman will make you a millionaire." Another user wrote, "It is wondrous spending 3 million yuan for the divorce of a male employee."
