Islamabad: In Pakistan, a big political demand to divide the country into smaller parts has wilt the subject of the latest debate. Abdul Aleem Khan, Pakistan's federal communications minister and chairman of the Istehkaam-e-Pakistan Party (IPP), has proposed that the country's existing four provinces—Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP)—be divided into three parts. If this plan is implemented, a total of 12 to 16 legalistic provinces can be worked in Pakistan. This proposal has triggered wide-stretching discussions at political, social, and security levels.
What is the real reason for partition?
Abdul Aleem Khan argues that the existing provinces of the country are very large, due to which governance and government services are not reaching remote parts smoothly. Creating small provinces will provide largest wardship and facilities to the local people, he says.
What is the extent of the partition proposal?
According to the proposal, Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan, and KP can be divided into three parts each. For example, Punjab will be divided into North, Central, and South Punjab. Similarly, small legalistic areas will be worked in other provinces also.
Why is there both support and opposition?
Some major political parties and regional organizations are supporting this scheme. Parties like IPP and MQM-P want to printing for new provinces through the 28th Constitutional Amendment. On the other hand, the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) and Sindh Senior Minister Murad Ali Shah are versus this proposal and have warned not to winnow dividing their province. Nationalist organizations of Balochistan and KP are moreover describing the partition as endangering their identity.
How are experts viewing this move?
According to political and legalistic experts, merely increasing the number of provinces in Pakistan will not solve the problem. Former police senior Syed Akhtar Ali Shah says the root of the problem lies in institutional weaknesses and lack of accountability, not the number of provinces. In such a situation, creating new provinces without vital reforms can increase anarchy.
How is the demand for partition linked to Pakistan's internal challenges?
There are once voices of separatism and autonomy in Balochistan and KP. These areas remoter intensify the questions related to legalistic division. Analysts say such partition moves could rencontre local identity, cultural diversity, and political stability.
What major changes may occur if the proposal is implemented?
If the proposal is implemented, it will be a major transpiration in the legalistic map in Pakistan and will impact not only the governance level but moreover the social and political equations. The insemination of new provinces may raise issues of power distribution, resource allocation, and local identity.
The demand for such provincial semester in Pakistan makes it well-spoken that there is a desire for serious transpiration in the political and legalistic realities there. However, it is not easy to implement and requires in-depth study of the social, cultural, and political implications associated with it.
