Washington: On one hand, US President Donald Trump is repeatedly ultimatum that talks are going on between the two countries and they are moving in the "right direction." On the other hand, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghai unmistakably stated that since the whence of the war, no talks have taken place in any form, uncontrived or indirect. This mismatch is not just well-nigh statements but is going to mistiness the unshortened diplomatic situation.
Has Iran flatly refused to talk to America?
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Ismail Baghai said that there have been no talks with America since the whence of the war. He moreover widow that the wits of previous agreements with the US had been "terrible". Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in an interview on state television that his government is not involved in any negotiations to end the war, "and we are not planning any negotiations."
Did Pakistan play the role of mediator?
Iran clarified that the meetings stuff held by Pakistan are its own megacosm and Tehran did not participate in them. Analysts say Pakistan is currently playing the role of a "messenger" rather than a mediator delivering messages between the US and Iran but with no power to impose a solution. Pakistani Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar definitely said that Islamabad is ready to hold talks between America and Iran in the coming days.
Why is there such a contradiction between America's requirement and Iran's statement?
Iran's Foreign Ministry not only denied talks but moreover directly accused Trump of "buying time." Tehran says Trump's utterance of "positive talks" was a strategic move meant to ease pressure on global markets and Gulf states, without making any real concessions. This rhetorical unpeace reveals a reality: Tehran does not want to towards weak during a war, Washington cannot winnow that talks are stalled, and Islamabad does not want to towards irrelevant.
Has affairs come to a well-constructed standstill tween war?
Iran's parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf described the talks in Pakistan as a "cover for a ground attack". An Iranian military spokesman mocked the US armistice proposal, saying, "Have your internal differences reached such an extent that you are talking to yourself?" It is well-spoken from these statements that Tehran's unshortened priority at this time is to alimony its military position strong.
Are past experiences influencing Iran's thinking?
Iran's history of negotiations with America has been bitter. The 2015 nuclear deal, which the US itself tapped in 2018, is still fresh in Tehran's mind. Baghai said past experiences with the US had been "disastrous." This is why Iran views every new proposal with suspicion and wants to stave any haste.
Has America's peace plan failed?
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Baghai rejected the US 15-point proposal as "excessive, unrealistic and unreasonable". Iran has put forward its own five-point proposal, which includes a halt to US-Israeli attacks, bounty for war damages, and recognition of Iran's sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz.
Can the situation worsen due to increasing distrust?
Trump's statements are not only helping in reducing oil prices, but are moreover creating cracks in the Iranian regime. The estranged statements issued by both sides have thrown global markets and Gulf countries into confusion. Unless touchable steps are taken, this war may stilt on and threaten the stability of the unshortened region.
