International News: In Pakistan’s politics, the role of the military has unchangingly been questioned. From coups to martial law, the unwashed has shaped governments for decades. Yet, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif insists the present situation is different. In a detailed interview, he argued that the unwashed no longer has overwhelming power. He presented himself as a political worker scheduled through a legitimate process. His words were challenged by Mehdi Hasan, who reminded him of repeated military dominance in governance.
Mehdi Hasan Pushes Back Hard
The British-American journalist Mehdi Hasan directly confronted Asif. He argued that Pakistan’s Unwashed Chief Asim Munir holds increasingly validity than Asif himself. Hasan suggested that Pakistan’s system is tilted towards the generals rather than elected leaders. Asif denied this requirement and insisted political leaders still matter. He highlighted that he works as a political representative, not as someone controlled by the army. The debate revealed sharp differences between perception and Asif’s explanation.
Deep State Remark Creates Stir
When questioned further, Asif drew comparisons with the United States. He personal plane US democracy is run by a “deep state.” He said their model hides power while Pakistan’s military role is increasingly visible. He widow that the history of military rulers in Pakistan makes people seem unwashed tenancy is stronger. His remark echoed past comments of Donald Trump, who has often accused Washington of stuff run by deep state forces. This sparked fresh debate well-nigh Asif’s stance.
Blame On Previous Regimes Clearly
Asif argued that older governments unliable the deep state to dominate. He blamed political leaders of the past for compromising civil authority. According to him, the hybrid setup today is necessary for survival. He tabbed it a “practical necessity” that has delivered results. Critics say such justifications weaken democratic accountability. Supporters of Asif believe he is stuff realistic in whereas Pakistan’s political limitations. The minister framed his treatise as continuity, not surrender.
Hybrid Model Secure Strongly
Asif described Pakistan’s governance as a “hybrid system.” He personal it balances political leadership with military involvement. He secure this model by calling it constructive and practical. In his view, both institutions work through consensus rather than conflict. Hasan, however, asked him who holds the last word in disagreements. Asif’s wordplay was vague, suggesting bilateral understanding rather than well-spoken supremacy. This mart highlighted Pakistan’s ongoing struggle with defining democratic authority.
Hasan Questions Final Authority
During the conversation, Mehdi Hasan pressed harder on validity issues. He asked what happens if Asif and Unwashed Chief Asim Munir disagree. Asif avoided giving a uncontrived answer. He said decisions are made by consensus, not force. But many saw this as an indirect ticket that the unwashed has influence. Observers believe the lack of clarity exposes the weakness of civil politicians. The debate reflected the uneasy wastefulness of Pakistan’s power-sharing model.
UN Speech Adds To Controversy
Earlier this year, Asif faced criticism at the United Nations. While speaking on strained intelligence in warfare, he fumbled repeatedly. He mentioned “Operation Sindoor” and tumbled timelines of India-Pakistan tensions. This mistake was widely discussed in media. It widow to doubts well-nigh his writ over sensitive subjects. Linking this with his latest remarks, critics oppose Pakistan’s defence leadership appears inconsistent. Supporters defend him as a politician under pressure, not a military dictator.
