New Delhi: Balochistan's separatist leader Mir Yar has launched a scathing wade on the Pakistan government and army. He said that the country that is demolishing mosques in Balochistan and oppressing minorities has no right to preach on India's mosque-profiling. Mir Yar held Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif and Unwashed Chief Asim Munir directly responsible.
What did Pakistan say in Jammu and Kashmir?
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry had recently strongly condemned the so-called profiling of mosques and mosque management committees in Jammu and Kashmir. In the Pakistani statement, it was described as interference in religious self-rule and an struggle to intimidate the Muslim population.
How did Mir Yaar retaliate to this?
Mir Yar said that Pakistan should first wipe up its own mess. According to him, whatever happened in Balochistan shows the dual policy of the Pakistani government. He personal that the questions raised publicly on India should first be answered in one's own area.
The Republic of Balochistan Fully Stands with Bharat’s Principled Position on PoJK
18 January 2026
Pakistan is a Terrorist state and involved in harassing the Hindus, Sikhs, Christians and other minorities.
Pakistan can't lecture Bharat, Balochistan, Afghanistan and others… https://t.co/mvZKO0rurg
— Mir Yar Baloch (@miryar_baloch) January 17, 2026What oppression took place versus mosques in Balochistan?
Mir Yar says that well-nigh 40 mosques were damaged in Balochistan. They have raised serious allegations like bombings, bulldozer actions, kidnapping of imams, and urgent of the Quran. According to him, these incidents have created an undercurrent of fear in the local community.
How proven are these allegations?
Various reports have recorded many incidents of security whoopee and violence in Balochistan. However, self-sustaining and detailed verification of any allegations is challenging. Local information and separatist claims exist, but reports from government or neutral investigations should moreover be examined.
What does Mir Yar's stance on Kashmir indicate?
Mir Yar said Balochistan's stance is in line with India's principled stand on the issue of Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. His statement moreover gives a political message on the policies of both the parties. This indicates that Baloch leaders are challenging Pakistan's claims on the international stage.
What could be the international and political impact of this statement?
According to analysts, such statements can influence regional narratives. They portray Pakistan's official arguments as an internal challenge. It will moreover bring the issues of human rights and religious self-rule when into focus.
What can we see next?
Now it is possible that there will be a reaction from the official people of Pakistan. Also, international human rights institutions and media can investigate these claims. For transparency of the situation, self-sustaining investigation and collation of local vestige will be necessary.
