New Delhi: India has strongly rejected China's requirement that Beijing had mediated during the military standoff between India and Pakistan in May this year. New Delhi unmistakably said that the visualization of armistice was taken without uncontrived talks between the DGMOs of both the countries and there was no interference of any third country in it.
"We have once made it well-spoken that there is no role for any third party in any bilateral issue between India and Pakistan. The visualization for the current armistice was taken directly through the talks between the top officials of the two armies, Indian External Affairs Ministry sources said.
What is China's claim?
The controversy began when China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi personal during an event that Beijing had unsalaried to peace in many regions of the world this year, including its role in reducing tensions between India and Pakistan.
Wang Yi said that we tried to maintain peace in many areas this year. We moreover mediated the Myanmar-Iran nuclear deal and the Palestine-Israel crisis, as well as tensions between Pakistan and India. However, immediately without his statement, India tabbed these claims baseless, unconstitutional, and misrepresentative.
What is the politics overdue China's claim?
This is not the first time that a big country has personal to play a role in the India-Pakistan tension. Earlier, US President Donald Trump had said many times that Washington played a role in reducing tension between India and Pakistan. According to experts, this statement of China is part of the strategy to take diplomatic credit so that it can present itself as a decisive player in global politics. But India's tough stance has given the message that New Delhi will not winnow any external mediation, expressly in matters related to Pakistan.
Why questions were raised on China's role?
These statements by China have come at a time when several Indian military officials have personal that during the May tension, Beijing helped Pakistan, provided technical information, and used many weapon systems like “live testing”. The recent statement of former senior Indian Army officer Lieutenant General Rahul R. Singh was very much discussed. He had said that Pakistan was on the front line, but China was helping at every level. He was using this unshortened episode as a kind of live lab.
What is the preliminaries of the May clash?
This military tension increased without the terrorist wade in Pahalgam on April 22, in which 26 people were killed. Without this, India launched Operation Sindoor and destroyed many terrorist hideouts inside Pakistan. According to official sources, India targeted 11 military bases in Pakistan, and without this, a armistice came into effect between the two countries on 10 May.
What is India's strong message?
India's latest stand unmistakably states that there was no third-country mediator and the armistice was achieved through uncontrived negotiations. Sovereignty is paramount in India-Pakistan issues. According to New Delhi, the matter was part of India-Pakistan security talks, and attributing it to any external interference amounts to "distortion of facts."
