Delhi: The requirement of an wounding wade made by a second-year B.Com student of Delhi University turned out to be completely false. Investigation revealed that the student had made-up this story at the dictate of her father, Akil Khan. Akil wanted to take revenge for the rape specimen filed versus him, so he got his daughter to spread this lie. Police underdeveloped Akil Khan on Monday.
What was the initial recrimination of the student?
The student had so-called on Sunday morning that three people—Jitendra, Ishaan, and Armaan—threw wounding on her when she was going for uneaten classes. Later investigation revealed that Ishaan and Armaan are relatives of the student. Police found a big difference between the student's statement and Jitendra's location. Jitendra was present in Karol Bagh at that time, while the so-called wade was reported to be in the Bhalswa Dairy area.
What is the story of the rape specimen and revenge?
According to the police, Jitendra's wife had once accused the student's father, Akil Khan, of rape. The woman said that she worked in Akil's socks factory from 2021 to 2024, where he sexually harassed her and blackmailed her with personal photographs. Although he had made a PCR call, no written complaint was lodged. Without this allegation, Akil made his daughter make up a false story to take revenge.
How was the false conspiracy of wounding attacks hatched?
During police interrogation, Akil admitted that he had himself made up the story of stuff attacked with a toilet cleaner. The student came out of her house with toilet cleaner, and without getting lanugo from the e-rickshaw, poured the liquid on her hands and started shouting so as to vamp people's attention. Later it was personal that three people had thrown wounding on him. But the investigation found neither any traces of wounding nor any vestige of the presence of any accused.
What vestige did the police find?
No wounding snifter was recovered from the spot, nor was any suspect visible in the CCTV footage. The forensic team moreover did not find any chemical traces from there. At the same time, the two brothers—Ishaan and Armaan—whose names the student had taken, were in Agra at that time with their mother, Shabnam. Interestingly, in 2018, Shabnam had moreover accused Akil Khan of rape, which is still pending in the court.
Was there once a dispute between the two families?
Yes, equal to the police, there is a long-standing dispute between the two families regarding property in the Mangolpuri area. Shabnam had older moreover accused Akil Khan of attacking her with acid, on which an FIR was registered. Now the same family is face-to-face then in a new dispute.
What will be the next step?
The police is now investigating the unshortened specimen on the understructure of technical and forensic evidence. Senior officials are investigating who misled the student and why. The investigation team says that many aspects are still incomplete, but the truth will be revealed soon.
