New Delhi: Bangladesh's visualization to withdraw from the ICC T20 World Cup has now taken a new turn. Bangladesh's interim sports counselor Asif Nazrul has now made a variegated requirement on the visualization which was stuff said to have been taken by the government till a few weeks ago. He has said that the visualization of not playing the World Cup was taken jointly by the Bangladesh Cricket Workbench and the players so that the nobility of the country and the safety of cricket could be given priority. This reverted stance has brought the unshortened matter under discussion again.
How did the story transpiration from a government visualization to a 'collective decision'?
In January, when Bangladesh had spoken its withdrawal from the T20 World Cup, Asif Nazrul had unmistakably said that whether the team plays or not is entirely the visualization of the government. At that time, security reasons and the so-called unfavorable environment in India were cited. Now Nazrul says that this visualization was taken jointly by BCB and the players, due to which questions have been raised on the statements given earlier.
Where did the controversy start?
This whole matter started when fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman was released from his team by Kolkata Knight Riders without political pressure. Without this incident, resentment increased in Dhaka and BCB demanded from ICC that Bangladesh's group matches should be held in co-host Sri Lanka instead of India.
Why did ICC reject Bangladesh's demand?
ICC refused to transpiration the schedule. Without this, Bangladesh Cricket Workbench took the official visualization to withdraw from the World Cup and Scotland was included in the tournament in place of the team. This visualization intensified the stir in international cricket.
What refinement has Asif Nazrul given now?
In a recent statement, Nazrul said that he has no regrets well-nigh this decision. According to him, the players and the workbench took this step keeping in mind the prestige of the country. He moreover said that this sacrifice was made to secure the future of Bangladeshi cricket.
How much impact did this mismatch have on the tournament?
Due to Bangladesh's withdrawal, clouds of slipperiness started looming over the tournament. The situation became increasingly serious when Pakistan moreover indicated it would snub its match versus India. This increased pressure on the ICC to handle the situation.
What solution was in the Lahore meetings?
Several rounds of talks were held in Lahore to reduce tension. Pakistan Cricket Workbench Chairman Mohsin Naqvi said that during the talks, Pakistan gave priority to the issue of Bangladesh over its own interests. Without these meetings the situation gradually returned to normal.
What visualization did ICC take versus Bangladesh?
The ICC unexplored a lenient stance, lamister punitive action. The workbench made it well-spoken that no financial penalty or sporting ban will be imposed on BCB. Bangladesh was moreover unpreventable of stuff given priority in hosting ICC events between 2028 and 2031.
What did BCB get from this decision?
The ICC moreover clarified that BCB will get its full revenue share so that there is no impact on the domestic cricket structure. This visualization is stuff seen as a big relief for Bangladesh cricket.
After all, how is this unshortened incident stuff viewed?
Although Bangladeshi fans will not get a endangerment to watch their team play in the World Cup, the workbench has come out of this slipperiness without any restrictions. Despite this, the reverted statements regarding the visualization have certainly left the question as to at what stage the very visualization to withdraw from the World Cup was taken.
