New Delhi: Controversy over Greenland has then emerged in international politics. US President Donald Trump's latest statement has increased the tension between European countries and NATO. Describing this huge Arctic island as important from a strategic point of view, Trump made a statement regarding its uncontrived control, which has wilt a matter of snooping for other countries.
What did Trump say?
Trump stressed that Greenland is of national security importance to the United States. He plane said that America is considering options to increase its influence on this. Trump had moreover talked well-nigh ownership Greenland last time, but now there is increasingly clarity in his stance.
What was the reaction of European countries?
European countries like Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Poland, and the United Kingdom have directly rejected America's views. These countries say that Greenland's destiny should be decided by Greenland's own people and Denmark and not under the pressure of any outside power. European leaders have emphasized respecting sovereignty, i.e., universal rights.
Why is NATO stuff added?
Trump's statement is moreover well-expressed the NATO syndication considering Denmark is its member. On one hand, America in its statement is describing Greenland as strategically important, while on the other hand, the Danish leadership is objecting to it. This situation within NATO is raising questions well-nigh syndication unity and the vital principles of security cooperation.
Why the “Arctic Sentry” discussion in the Arctic?
Some European leaders and experts are talking well-nigh a NATO-led mission to strengthen security in the Arctic. A proposal like “Arctic Sentry” has come in, in which joint monitoring and security deployment in the Arctic region with European countries is stuff considered. This is considered to be an effort to maintain security wastefulness for other member countries, including America.
What is the reason for the dispute?
Greenland is not only important geographically but has moreover wilt the part-way of new possibilities in the Arctic due to natural resources, sea routes, and waffly climate. Due to global warming, sea routes are opening up, due to which the interest of global players like Russia and China in Greenland and the Arctic has moreover increased.
Now what can happen next?
From the perspective of international diplomacy, the Greenland dispute does not seem to be resolved soon. The reaction of European countries and divisions within NATO are increasing. Experts believe that Trump's statement has started a new debate on Arctic policy and security cooperation, and in the future it will moreover impact global politics and security strategies.
