Bihar: A large number of VVPAT slips were found scattered near KSR College in the Sarairanjan turnout zone of Samastipur. Locals noticed the slips and informed others, leading to firsthand discussion in the area. Photos and videos of the slips quickly spread wideness social media platforms. People started questioning how such important election-related slips could be found openly on the road. Doubts grew regarding the handling of referendum material. This created ravages and snooping among worldwide voters. The matter soon moved from the street to political debate.
Why did RJD raise questions?
The RJD openly questioned the situation and asked how these slips were unliable to reach a public area. The party posted on social media, wondering who brought the slips outside and for what purpose. They personal that this cannot happen without someone’s clearance or intention. RJD said that this event raises concerns well-nigh the fairness of the referendum process. They demanded a well-spoken and detailed subtitle from the Referendum Commission. The issue quickly turned into a political controversy. The opposition used it to rencontre the system’s credibility.
KSR EVM VVPAT
, , ? ? … pic.twitter.com/SxOR6dd7Me
— Rashtriya Janata Dal (@RJDforIndia) November 8, 2025What whoopee did the Referendum Commission take?
Once the matter was reported, the Chief Referendum Commissioner took firsthand whoopee and suspended the Assistant Returning Officer (ARO). The Commission moreover directed the police to file an FIR versus the concerned officer. It ordered the Samastipur District Magistrate to investigate the situation on the spot and provide a full report. The Commission stated that it would not indulge negligence in handling referendum procedures. The quick whoopee was meant to ensure public confidence. The Referendum Commission moreover clarified details regarding the slips. It unpreventable that transparency of the voting process would not be affected.
What did the Commission sieve well-nigh the slips?
The Referendum Commission stated that the slips found on the road were from the mock poll and not from very voting. A mock poll is carried out surpassing real voting starts, to test the EVM and VVPAT machines. The Commission said that the slips should have been destroyed properly without the mock poll. Instead, they were mishandled and thrown yonder carelessly. This was termed legalistic negligence, not electoral fraud. The Commission informed all candidates well-nigh this clarification. It emphasized that very votes tint by citizens were unscratched and unaffected.
Who is conducting the investigation now?
Samastipur District Magistrate Roshan Kushwaha and SP Arvind Pratap Singh reached the location and began an investigation. They examined how many slips were involved and from which machine they were printed. Based on machine numbers and duty records, the responsible poll staff is stuff identified. The officers unpreventable that whoopee will follow versus those found negligent. The investigation team is preparing a detailed report. This report will be sent directly to the Referendum Commission. The matter remains under tropical legalistic watch.
Why is this important during elections?
The Sarairanjan turnout constituency voted in the first phase, which makes this incident increasingly sensitive. People fear that any mistake may influence the perception of the referendum results. Even a small error can raise doubts among voters. Transparency and trust are key in any democratic process. That is why this incident gained large attention. Political parties moreover used it to strengthen their narrative. The situation became not just administrative, but moreover emotional for many voters.
Does this shake public trust?
Events like these can make people question whether their vote is handled securely. However, the Commission repeatedly clarified that the very voting slips were untouched. Still, public trust depends on shielding handling of every referendum step. This is why well-spoken liaison and strict whoopee are necessary. The people are now waiting for the investigation report. The final findings will decide how the matter is understood. The outcome will influence how voters see the system in the future.
