New Delhi: Amidst the long-running tension between India and Canada, Indian High Commissioner Dinesh Patnaik has issued an unshut rencontre to Canada, saying that if there is any vestige to support the allegations made versus India, then they should be presented in the court. He completely rejected the claims related to the involvement of the Indian government in the Hardeep Singh Nijjar murder specimen and said that this unshortened matter is politically motivated and far from facts.
Why did India undeniability Canada's allegations politically motivated?
In an interview, Dinesh Patnaik said that some security and intelligence agencies of Canada are working under the influence of Khalistani separatist groups. He so-called that such an undercurrent is stuff created versus India, which will spoil the relations between the two countries. Patnaik said India has unchangingly cooperated with Canadian security agencies and there have been several meetings between officials of the two countries in the last year.
High Commissioner @DineshKPatnaik says:
“I am disappointed by the allegations made in the Globe and Mail vendible today. India has maintained spanking-new cooperation, expressly over the past year, with law enforcement and security agencies in Canada. The visit of the NSAs and the… https://t.co/OsU7Ch8U21
— India in Canada (@HCI_Ottawa) May 26, 2026What questions did India raise on the ‘public trial’?
The Indian High Commissioner said that a "public trial" was stuff conducted through media and political statements, whereas any specimen should be decided in a magistrate of law. He said that till now no suppositious public vestige has come forward from Canada, which can prove that the Indian government has any connection with the Nijjar massacre. He asked the Canadian government that if they have any touchable information then it should be presented through the legal process.
Patnaik moreover refused to completely rule out the possibility that some “mad elements” or people vicarial independently could be involved in the incident. However, he clarified that the Indian government has nothing to do with it. He moreover mentioned former Indian intelligence officer Vikas Yadav, whose name had cropped up in some reports.
How did the Canadian government respond to India's claims?
Meanwhile, the Canadian government has denied Indian claims. Canada's Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangari said that his intelligence organ CSIS works independently and the allegations versus it are baseless. He said that the investigating agencies are doing their work on the understructure of facts.
