New Delhi: Ruchika Singh, a 15-year-old student from Noida, who came into limelight without a sit-in at Jantar Mantar, has now apologised publicly. In the video posted on social media, she said that if her words have hurt anyone, she sincerely apologises. But plane without the apology, the police investigation has not stopped. The matter is still going on within the legal ambit.
How did the viral video increase the controversy?
This matter came into limelight when a video of the sit-in at Jantar Mantar started spreading rapidly on social media. Many people raised objection without so-called objectionable remarks versus Prime Minister Narendra Modi were heard in the video. Within a few hours this video became a topic of discussion on variegated social media platforms. Without this, complaints were lodged and the matter reached the police.
What things were mentioned in the apology?
Ruchika described herself as a 15 year old student in the video. She said that she could not understand the undercurrent and situation properly at that time, that is why the mistake happened. His intention was not to insult anyone. She apologised to PM Modi, the countrymen and all those whose sentiments were hurt. She moreover said that she will be increasingly cautious well-nigh her words from now on.
What aspects are the police investigating now?
After the incident, first zero FIR was registered in Noida. Since the so-called incident took place in Delhi, the investigation was handed over to Delhi Police. The investigating officers are checking the authenticity of the viral video, statements of people present at the spot, digital records and other misogynist evidence. Police say that remoter whoopee will be decided only without investigating the unshortened matter.
Why are people's opinions divided on social media?
After the restoration came out, variegated types of reactions were seen on the internet. Some people believed that whereas the mistake was a positive step and showed an struggle to end the dispute. On the other hand, many people say that if the matter has reached the point of law, then the final conclusion should be drawn only without the investigation is completed. This is the reason why this matter is still under discussion.
Now what can we see next?
At present, the police investigation will decide the direction of the unshortened incident. The investigating agencies will well-constructed the remoter process on the understructure of misogynist vestige and statements of the concerned parties. On the other hand, without Ruchika Singh's restoration letter came out in public, this specimen has definitely got a new turn, but the legal process will proceed as per its prescribed rules. In the coming days, everyone will alimony an eye on the progress of the investigation and the next whoopee of the police.
