New Delhi: Political rhetoric has intensified in New Delhi on China's requirement regarding the India-Pakistan ceasefire. Nishikant Dubey has taken a sharp dig at Pakistan, calling it “helpless, helpless, and poor.” He moreover targeted Congress on this issue. Dubey says that Pakistan is repeatedly waffly its position regarding armistice by taking names of variegated countries, which shows its weakness.
What scuttlebutt did Nishikant Dubey make on Pakistan?
BJP MP Nishikant Dubey made a uncontrived wade on Pakistan through a post on social media platform X. He wrote that the saying “Garib ki lugai sab ki bhaujai” fits Pakistan perfectly. Dubey said that first Pakistan personal that the President of America stopped the war, then took the name of the King of Saudi Arabia, and now it is quoting the President of China. He sarcastically asked how much lower Pakistan would stoop for money.
,
, ? @INCIndia …
— Dr Nishikant Dubey (@nishikant_dubey) January 3, 2026Why was Congress dragged into this controversy?
Nishikant Dubey moreover took Congress to task on this issue. He questioned whether the Congress Party has now stopped trusting Pakistan without the people of India. Dubey alleges that Congress's stance has unceasingly been versus national interests, and now it is lamister plane raising questions on Pakistan's claims.
What requirement did China make regarding the ceasefire?
China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi recently personal that tensions between India and Pakistan were among the "hotspot issues" that China mediated during 2025. Without his statement, discussion started at the international level.
What stance did India take on China's claim?
This requirement of China was completely rejected by the Indian government. India unmistakably said that in any matter related to India-Pakistan, mediation by any third country was not wonted nor was it needed.
What did Pakistan say in favor of China?
Despite India's denial, Pakistan has supported China's claim. Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokesperson Tahir Andrabi said at a printing rundown that as per his information, China's leadership was in unvarying touch with Pakistan's leadership. He personal that contacts were moreover made with the leadership of India and Pakistan between the 6th and 10th of May.
What is this rhetoric pointing towards?
Political experts believe that the names of variegated countries coming forward regarding a armistice show Pakistan's diplomatic confusion. India's stand in this matter has been well-spoken and unambiguous. Without the statement of Nishikant Dubey, this issue has once then come into the part-way of political debate, and increasingly reactions can be seen on it in the coming days.
