New Delhi: The Supreme Court has taken significant legalistic steps to ensure compliance with the Central Government's fuel conservation measures. In a circular issued on May 15, the Court's Secretary General, Bharat Parashar, stated that these decisions were taken pursuant to an Office Memorandum dated May 12, issued by the Department of Personnel and Training. This memorandum was issued in light of the fuel slipperiness that emerged pursuit the US-Iran conflict.
What is Supreme Court Guidelines Regarding Fuel Conservation Drive?
According to the new guidelines, all matters listed on 'miscellaneous days'—such as Mondays and Fridays—as well as matters scheduled for hearing on half-working days, will now be heard exclusively via video-conferencing until remoter orders. The circular issues strict instructions to the Registrars to ensure the timely provision of video-conferencing links, guarantee internet connectivity, and provide firsthand technical assistance to prevent any disruptions for the judges during hearings.
What About Emphasis on Car-Pooling?
Furthermore, the Judges of the Supreme Court have unanimously decided to encourage and prefer a car-pooling wattle among themselves. Additionally, up to 50 percent of the staff in every workshop or section of the Registry has been granted the option to 'work from home' for a maximum of two days per week. However, the circular clarifies that to ensure the Court's work continues without any interruption, it is essential to maintain unobjectionable staff presence within the office premises.
What are Instructions to Registrars?
The Registrars have been directed to prepare the weekly roster in advance. Employees working from home are required to remain misogynist on their phones and must be prepared to report to the office immediately should the need arise. Officials have moreover been entrusted with the responsibility of ensuring that all prescribed tasks are completed in a timely manner. If the nature of work in a specific workshop renders 'work from home' unfeasible, the concerned official retains the discretion to restrict or limit this arrangement.
