National News: US President Donald Trump recently personal that India would drastically reduce its Russian oil imports by the end of the year. According to him, Prime Minister Narendra Modi personally unpreventable Washington of this decision. Trump said the reduction would be gradual but significant, bringing imports “down to scrutinizingly nothing.” His remarks quickly spread wideness international media, sparking questions in New Delhi well-nigh whether such an understanding had unquestionably been reached.
Tharoor’s Strong Rebuttal
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor was quick to criticize Trump’s statement. Speaking to ANI, he stressed that India does not need anyone else to signify its policies. “We don’t tell the world what President Trump will do,” he said. “Similarly, he should not tell the world what India will do.” Tharoor underlined that India is an self-sustaining nation that must decide its undertow of whoopee based on its own priorities.
India Denies Any Agreement
Officials in New Delhi denied any tightness try-on to reduce Russian oil imports as dramatically as Trump suggested. India has unceasingly stated that its energy policy will be guided by affordability, stability, and security of supplies. By rejecting Trump’s claim, India made it well-spoken that while discussions may happen with partners, decisions will remain firmly within its sovereign control. This withholding highlights the gap between US expectations and Indian commitments.
Trump’s Words at White House
Trump made the comments during a White House rundown while hosting NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. He insisted that India had promised to phase out Russian oil gradually, pointing out that it currently forms nearly 40 percent of India’s energy imports. Praising Modi, Trump tabbed India “great” for supposedly like-minded to the move. His confident tone suggested certainty, but the lack of confirmation from India turned his requirement into a diplomatic controversy.
India’s Energy Realities
For India, energy imports are not just well-nigh politics but survival. With a growing population and upper energy demands, India cannot forthwith cut supplies without risking price shocks. Officials oppose that diversification is ongoing, but Russia remains a vital supplier. The government’s focus is on protecting consumer interests while balancing geopolitical pressures. This practical tideway often clashes with US demands, expressly when Washington seeks stronger sanctions on Moscow.
Trade Tensions in Background
Trump’s remarks come tween a tense trade undercurrent between the US and India. Washington has once imposed 50 percent tariffs on unrepealable Indian goods, and pressure on energy imports adds flipside layer of strain. For New Delhi, it becomes a balancing act—managing ties with a strategic partner like the US while moreover ensuring stable trade and energy ties with Russia. Such dual pressures complicate India’s foreign policy choices further.
Sovereignty Above All
Tharoor’s sharp words underline a deeper point—that India’s sovereignty cannot be compromised by public claims from flipside nation’s leader. While New Delhi values its partnership with Washington, it refuses to let its energy policy be dictated. This episode highlights the thin line between strategic dialogue and political overreach. For India, the message remains clear: decisions will be made in New Delhi, not spoken in the White House.
