Mumbai: Without the big defeat versus Chennai Super Kings, Mumbai Indians have come into the news not only for their performance but moreover for a decision. Without Mitchell Santner got injured during the match, concussion replacement was taken, on which questions are now stuff raised.
What happened on the field?
Santner fell while trying to take a reservation during CSK's innings. He completed the reservation but had to leave the field without that. At that time it was not well-spoken how serious the injury was.
Was the injury in the shoulder or the head?
From here the matter seemed to get a bit complicated. Initially the issue of shoulder injury came to light, but later a concussion replacement was taken, due to which the discussion intensified.
Why did the team get concussion?
Mumbai Indians officially appealed for this. Under the rules, replacement is misogynist only when the player has symptoms like throne injury or dizziness.
What did the mentor say?
After the match, Mahela Jayawardene told that Santner's throne had moreover hit the ground. He said that the player was feeling dizzy, hence this visualization was taken.
Did the clearance come easily?
The umpire and match referee wonted the team's demand. Without this Shardul Thakur was fielded.
How much impact could Shardul Thakur make?
His contribution in batting was limited. The team did not see the impact it needed.
How was Mumbai's condition in the match?
The team was seen struggling throughout the match. The target was big and the batting could not survive. In the end the team was all out for 104 runs.
Will this visualization be discussed further?
There is often debate in such matters. Questions have been raised well-nigh the concussion rule before, and this time too the discussion doesn't seem to be stopping.
What is the rencontre for the team now?
Continuous defeats and now controversies, both together are increasing the pressure. The team will have to make a comeback soon. Without this whole matter, the debate regarding the interpretation of the rules of concussion replacement may moreover intensify. Teams can now be increasingly cautious well-nigh such decisions so that no controversy arises.
