International News: President Trump stated that on June 22, the U.S. launched precision airstrikes on Iran’s top three nuclear sites: Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. The objective, he said, was to cripple Iran’s nuclear program permanently. According to Trump, the targeted bombing disrupted critical infrastructure and halted uranium enrichment efforts. While addressing the media, he insisted the move prevented a looming regional catastrophe. “This is not about war, it’s about peace through strength,” Trump added confidently.
Comparisons To Hiroshima Surface
At the NATO summit in The Hague, Trump made a startling comparison between these airstrikes and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII. “I hesitate to say it... but this was the kind of strike that ends wars,” he remarked. Trump clarified that although nuclear weapons were not used, the scale and precision carried a similar historical impact. His comments triggered mixed global reactions—some saw them as strong deterrence, others as diplomatic recklessness.
Iran Confirms Damage, Not Defeat
Iran acknowledged that its nuclear installations suffered damage but rejected claims of total destruction. Officials stated that centrifuges were damaged and control systems disrupted, but recovery efforts are underway. Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization said, “Our resolve remains unshaken.” Tehran’s military spokesperson added that retaliatory options remain on the table. The Iranian foreign ministry condemned the U.S. action as a breach of sovereignty and international law.
U.S. Intelligence Awaits Assessment
Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Dan Kane, stated that preliminary assessments show “significant structural damage” to the nuclear facilities. However, he cautioned that final evaluations could take weeks. The Pentagon is relying on Israeli intelligence to further validate the operation’s success. “Our strike was surgical, but we await ground confirmation,” Kane told reporters.
Israel’s Role Under Scrutiny
Though the strikes were American-led, analysts speculate Israel’s deep coordination. Israeli drones were reportedly used to confirm target accuracy pre-strike. Netanyahu’s government has remained tight-lipped but sources suggest Mossad provided vital intelligence. Regional experts say this may mark a silent, joint offensive strategy going forward. It’s unclear whether this closes the Israel-Iran conflict chapter or ignites a new one.
Global Reactions Mixed, Uneasy
The international community has responded with caution. Russia and China criticized the U.S. for unilateral aggression, while NATO allies maintained diplomatic silence. The United Nations has requested an emergency session. Humanitarian agencies are concerned about environmental fallout near civilian zones. With no Iranian casualties reported, the world watches whether this marks peace—or the calm before another storm.
