New Delhi: Differences have emerged between the Bangladesh Cricket Workbench and the International Cricket Council regarding the ICC Men's T20 World Cup. Bangladesh refused to play its scheduled matches in India, without which the matter came into discussion at the international level. The tournament is to be jointly hosted by India and Sri Lanka, and the schedule has once been released.
In such a situation, this visualization of Bangladesh has put the ICC in an uncomfortable situation. To handle the situation, ICC decided to visit Bangladesh so that a middle path could be found through talks.
Why did Bangladesh refuse to play in India?
The Bangladesh Cricket Workbench cited security reasons. The workbench said that in the current situation there are apprehensions regarding the safety of the players. The government's opinion was moreover stated in favor of this decision.
Did the government play an important role in this decision?
According to sources, this visualization was not taken only at the workbench level. Bangladesh government reviewed the security situation. Following government advice, the workbench unexplored a strict stance.
What stance did the ICC take on this issue?
ICC chose the path of dialogue instead of confrontation. It was decided to send a delegation for uncontrived talks with Bangladesh. The purpose of ICC was said to be to end the deadlock.
Will it be easy to transpiration the schedule of the tournament?
ICC has once made it well-spoken that the schedule has been decided. A transpiration for any one team will stupefy the unshortened plan. This will moreover stupefy the preparations of other teams.
Why did Bangladesh suggest an volitional location?
Bangladesh talked well-nigh holding its matches in some other country. Sri Lanka was seen as a possible option. Pakistan's name moreover came up in discussion in some reports.
What is ICC's requirement on security assessment?
India was supposed unscratched in ICC's internal assessment. The risk was considered to be low to moderate. The ICC says that the host country is capable of providing security.
What is the opinion of the players and team management?
Some players expressed snooping in private conversations. However, no one made any unshut statement publicly. The team management supported the board's decision.
Can the World Cup be unauthentic by this controversy?
If Bangladesh sticks to its decision, changes will be necessary. The wastefulness of group matches may get disturbed. ICC wants to stave this situation.
What solution can sally from the ICC visit?
The delegation can requite security related assurances. Efforts will be made to establish trust between both sides. There is a possibility that some middle path may emerge.
What does the next picture squint like?
Talks are ongoing between ICC and Bangladesh Board. The final visualization may be taken in the coming days. The vision of the unshortened cricket world are stock-still on the resolution of this dispute.
