Gaza: Hamas has given an important signal surpassing the next phase of the ongoing cease-fire try-on in Gaza. A senior leader of the organization has said that if there is a need to maintain peace in a new try-on with Israel, they are ready to negotiate on temporarily “freezing” their weapons or keeping them “stored” in unscratched places. This stance has come at a time when the second and most difficult phase of this US-brokered try-on is well-nigh to begin.
Bassem Naim, a member of Hamas's political bureau, speaking to The Associated Press in Doha, said the organization was ready to discuss any comprehensive solution that could prevent a resurgence of tensions. He said that the objective should be to ensure that no mismatch or explosive situation arises in the future.
Negotiations moving towards difficult phase
This statement of Naeem has come at such a juncture when both Israel and Hamas are going to negotiate on those points that are considered to be the most ramified part of the agreement. In the first phase, both sides had exchanged prisoners and hostages. Now only the remains of one Israeli policeman are said to exist in Gaza.
The armistice began without a long military operation that Israel launched in response to the Hamas wade of October 7, 2023. Increasingly than 1,200 people were killed in the wade and increasingly than 250 were taken hostage. Without this, a large part of Gaza was destroyed in Israeli whoopee and increasingly than 70 thousand Palestinians died.
Why is the second phase considered difficult?
The coming period is challenging considering consensus will have to be reached on many important issues. These include proposals like the visit of an international security gravity in Gaza, the insemination of a technical committee for administration, the phased withdrawal of Israeli forces, and the release of weapons by Hamas. There is a possibility of forming an international workbench to monitor these points, which will be commanded by US President Trump.
Hamas's position on weapons
Israel is willful that the way for any permanent try-on will be well-spoken only if Hamas completely gives up its arms. Naim said that the organization maintains the “right of resistance,” but if a real peace process lasting five to ten years is initiated and the Palestinian side guarantees it, then freezing or storing weapons can be considered.
Naim made it well-spoken that the understructure of any visualization should be Palestinian consent and long-term stability. The talks in the coming days will decide how both sides wastefulness these difficult conditions.
