Tehran: Tension between America and Iran is increasing day by day. Preparations for the second round of talks are going on in Pakistan, but Tehran's tough reactions have remoter heated up the atmosphere. Iran has made it well-spoken that it will not sit at the negotiating table under any pressure or threat.
Has Iran once given strong signals surpassing talks?
Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said that in the current situation it is not easy to talk directly with America. He stressed that dialogue is possible only when there is an undercurrent of equality and respect. Ghalibaf said in well-spoken words that Iran is not a country that comes under pressure. He moreover termed the US Navy tampon as a 'clumsy and stupid move'.
Has Trump been accused of pressure politics?
Taking aim at Donald Trump, Ghalibaf said that America either wants surrender from Iran or is looking for an excuse to escalate the conflict. According to him, instead of making talks a ways of compromise, they are stuff used as a weapon of pressure. He warned that if America does not remove its blockade, traffic in the Strait of Hormuz will be tightened.
Did the first meeting remoter weaken trust?
The first round of talks held in Pakistan remained inconclusive. After that both the countries accused each other of breaking the ceasefire. Iran says that in such an environment it has wilt difficult to move forward with confidence. In the first round, Iran had described the American proposals as 'exaggerated' and 'impractical'.
Did Trump's warning make the situation worse?
Trump recently said that if the talks do not yield any results, the situation could wilt serious. He talked well-nigh making a 'very reasonable' offer to Iran but moreover warned that if an try-on is not reached, military whoopee could be taken again. After this statement from Tehran, the reaction has wilt increasingly strict.
Are questions stuff raised well-nigh America's intentions?
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi said that American deportment and statements are creating doubt instead of towers trust. He so-called that repeated armistice violations and provocative statements were weakening the dialogue process. Aragchi stressed that no try-on is possible without trust.
