New Delhi: The latest stance of the government regarding reservation in Maharashtra has once then sparked a political debate. CM Devendra Fadnavis has unmistakably said that no separate reservation will be given to Muslims in the state and the 5 percent reservation implemented older is no longer effective. After this statement, the ruling party and the opposition have come squatter to squatter and the matter has wilt a topic of social discussion.
What position did the CM put on reservation?
The CM said that the state government can take decisions only within the sweep of the Constitution. According to him, religion cannot be the understructure of reservation. He moreover reiterated that the government is not versus any polity but is pursuit legal and ramble provisions.
How was the system of 5% reservation implemented?
This system was started during the tenure of the previous government. At that time it was seen as linked to social and educational backwardness. However, questions were raised on this visualization from the very whence and political and legal controversies moreover arose regarding it.
Why did the government decide to end it?
The government argues that decisions related to reservation should be made on a strong legal basis. According to the Chief Minister, the system given older was not going to stand the test of the courts. For this reason the government decided not to protract it further.
Will the Muslim polity not get any goody from reservation?
The government has made it well-spoken that the Muslim polity is not stuff completely excluded from reservation. Those who fall under Other Backward Classes or any other reservation category will protract to avail benefits under the same categories as before. The government says that everyone will be given equal opportunities on the understructure of eligibility.
How did the opposition react to the government's decision?
After this decision, opposition parties have targeted the government. They say that this step ignores the concerns of the minority community. Some leaders so-called that the government was taking decisions keeping in mind political gains rather than social balance.
How are legal experts viewing this decision?
Legal experts believe that the courts of the country have once made it well-spoken that religion cannot be the understructure of reservation. For this reason, the government's statement that the visualization is in vibrations with the Constitution is stuff considered legally strong. However, experts moreover say that a detailed study regarding social unassertiveness is necessary.
What impact can this have on the politics of Maharashtra?
The issue of reservation has unchangingly been sensitive in Maharashtra. In such a situation, this visualization may stupefy the political equations in the future. While the ruling party is calling it compliance with the law, the opposition is linking it to public sentiments.
What will be the government's stance going forward?
The government says that its focus will now be on progressing all sections through education, employment and minutiae schemes. The Chief Minister has indicated that maintaining equal opportunities and social wastefulness will be the priority of the government. Overall, this visualization of the government regarding Muslim reservation has given rise to a new debate in Maharashtra. In the coming days, this issue may remain in discussion at both political and social levels.
