New Delhi: The wrecking that happened on 3rd February in Dwarka, Delhi, is the kind of nightmare no one overly wants to experience. 23-year-old Sahil Dhaneshra was going to office on his bike. Near Lal Bahadur Shastri Institute in Sector-11, virtually 11.30 am, a speedy Scorpio SUV hit his Yamaha R15 from overdue with such gravity that Sahil died on the spot.
How severe was the collision?
Police and postmortem reports say that the standoff was so strong that Sahil's throne was immensely torn, several ribs were broken, and his elbow was shattered. The rationalization of death was deep throne injury and bleeding. The SUV moreover went superiority and collided with a parked Swift Dezire cab, injuring cab suburbanite Ajit Singh. Sahil was well-nigh to reach the office. He was just 10 minutes away, but everything was over.
Who was driving the car?
17-year-old boy Akshatra Singh was driving the Scorpio. The police unprotected him on the spot. A specimen was registered versus him under sections 281 (negligent driving), 106(1) (causing death by negligence) and 125(a) (endangering life) of the Indian Penal Code. The Juvenile Workbench sent him to the observation home, but on February 10, he got temporary ladle for the 10th workbench exam.
What did the accused's father say to the media?
On Tuesday, the boy's father came in front of the cameras and spoke in a tearful voice. He said: "Our unshortened family is in shock. The Scorpio is our transport company's vehicle. I had no idea that my son was driving. He was going to waif his sister somewhere. I was out at that time, my wife tabbed from home. I can finger the pain of the victim's family. I am very sorry."
He moreover said that he has given all the documents to the police and is fully cooperating in the investigation. His sister was not making a reel; it was just a short video.
Why a specimen versus the father also?
The police imposed Section 199A of the Motor Vehicle Act on the father. Under this section, if a minor breaks the rules by driving a vehicle, then the owner or guardian of the vehicle is responsible. Investigation revealed that the boy had older supposed his age wrong. When the real age came to light, whoopee was taken versus the father also.
Sahil's mother's wrongness and pain
Sahil's mother said with unconfined wrongness and heartbreak, "My son was just 10 minutes yonder from the office. He was lying on the road for 10 minutes; no help came. That boy should not have been driving. I want the strictest whoopee possible versus him."
Sahil worked part-time in an insurance visitor and was going to study in the UK this year. The mother says that the minor was making videos while performing stunts, due to which her son lost his life.
This wrecking is not just a death; it ended all the dreams of a family. People are now taxing strictness on minors driving, speeding and stunts on the road. Police investigation is still going on.
