The Kota Consumer Protection Magistrate has taken serious note of a complaint versus Bollywood two-face Salman Khan and the Rajshree Pan Masala company. The complaint alleges the brand’s telecast is misleading considering it claims the product contains real saffron.
The magistrate has issued notices to both the two-face and the company, asking them to explain their stand by November 27. This specimen has now drawn sustentation nationwide as it involves a idealism endorsement and consumer rights.
Who Filed The Complaint?
The complaint was filed by senior BJP leader and Rajasthan High Magistrate well-wisher Inder Mohan Singh Honey. He stated that Rajshree Pan Masala is deceiving consumers by saying that its five-rupee pouch contains saffron. He pointed out that saffron is an expensive spice costing nearly four lakh rupees per kilogram. Therefore, it is untellable for any visitor to include real saffron in such a unseemly pouch without misleading the public.
What Did The Lawyer Claim?
Lawyer Ripudaman Singh, representing the complainant, said both Salman Khan and the visitor were equally responsible for misleading consumers. He emphasized that the telecast promotes harmful products among youth, creating false glamour virtually pan masala and tobacco. The complaint moreover warned that such ads can increase the risk of serious diseases like cancer and lung infections among regular users.
How Did The Magistrate React?
After reviewing the complaint and initial evidence, the magistrate issued a formal notice to Salman Khan and the company. They must respond by November 27 with their written statement. The magistrate observed that false razzmatazz can mislead consumers and harm public health. The move has sent a strong message to razzmatazz agencies and trademark ambassadors that peccancy is essential when endorsing such products.
What Are The Health Concerns?
Experts say pan masala often contains ingredients harmful to the mouth, liver, and stomach. The use of celebrities in razzmatazz these products can make them towards stylish or harmless, expressly to the younger generation. The complaint insists that such misleading endorsements indirectly encourage tendency and poor health habits. It moreover highlights that saffron, stuff a luxury ingredient, is often used as a marketing trick to vamp buyers.
What Did The Complainant Demand?
The complainant demanded that all advertisements of such harmful products should be stopped immediately. He moreover urged the government to revoke Salman Khan’s national awards for misleading the public for profit. According to him, it is unethical for an influential idealism to promote products that can harm health and misguide millions of fans wideness the country.
What Happens Next?
The specimen is now stuff widely discussed wideness India, with debates on idealism peccancy in advertising. The court’s next hearing will be crucial in deciding whether the ad violated consumer protection laws. If found guilty, the visitor could squatter heavy penalties, and the two-face might squatter legal consequences. The final verdict could set a precedent for future idealism endorsements and consumer rights awareness.
