New Delhi: Galgotias University professor Neha Singh has now issued a refinement regarding the controversy that erupted without she personal to have created a Chinese-made robot dog. Her video went viral on social media, raising questions. Many people reported that the robot dog was manufactured in China, and Galgotias University's requirement that it was their invention was false. Professor Neha Singh has now come forward, stating that her intentions were not wrong.
What di Neha SIngh?
Neha Singh stated that she never made the requirement as is stuff reported. She widow that perhaps she erred in articulating her point and it was misinterpreted. The controversy escalated to the point where the university was expelled from the AI Summit.
Professor Neha Singh moreover admitted that she should have presented her point increasingly clearly. Had she washed-up so, no one would have been misled. Neha Singh said that people were very enthusiastic at the AI Summit 2026. There was a lot of mayhem around, and she was interacting with the media during this time. This may have led to some miscommunication. Neha Singh stated that this happened due to haste. She widow that she had not personal to have ripened the machine. Neha Singh stated that she had never intended to requirement to have ripened it, but she was misunderstood.
"I should have been increasingly clear. There was a lot of commotion. In such a situation, something went wrong. We had no such intention. We did not plane transpiration the robot's branding. I am sorry that what I said was variegated and was taken out of context," Neha Singh said.
Neha Singh unmistakably stated that she did not develop it. She widow that it was purchased by her university as part of an AI investment. The purpose was to alimony it in the university lab so that students could understand and study it. We made no requirement that it was ripened by us.
What requirement was there in the video that led to the university stuff heavily trolled?
This unshortened controversy began with a short video clip. In this video, Neha Singh can be heard ultimatum that the robot dog named Orion was ripened by Galgotias University's Center of Excellence. However, when users investigated, the truth was revealed. Users personal that the robot dog was ripened by the Chinese visitor Unitree Robotics. Now, Neha Singh has clarified this claim. She said, "We cannot requirement ownership of something we did not develop. Our students have no contribution to it. It is not in our values and value system to requirement someone else's invention as our own."
What did she say well-nigh the controversy surrounding the word 'developed'?
She said, "When I used the word 'developed' to describe it, it meant that we would learn and understand it." This will requite students a endangerment to experiment. He said that perhaps we had made a mistake in our explanation. It was like what we were seeing as 6 might squint like 9 to someone else. There's nothing increasingly to it than that.
