Bareilly: These days, Bollywood actress Nusrat Bharucha is in the news increasingly for her religious journey than her personal life. At the Mahakaleshwar temple in Ujjain, he recently participated in the Bhasma Aarti, had darshan of Lord Mahakal, and offered water. When pictures and videos of Nusrat's presence in the temple premises surfaced, people's reactions were divided on social media. While some people tabbed it their personal belief, many users and religious organizations tabbed it inappropriate.
What happened in the Mahakal temple of Ujjain?
According to the information, Nusrat reached Mahakal temple on Tuesday morning to shepherd Bhasma Aarti. She worshiped in the temple in traditional style and participated in the religious process. The local priests gave him darshan and offered him water. Nusrat moreover talked well-nigh peace and positive experiences in the temple. She says that she had come to seek blessings from Lord Mahakal.
What statement did Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi give?
But his move did not go lanugo well with the national president of All India Muslim Jamaat, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi. In a statement to IANS from Bareilly (Uttar Pradesh), Razvi said that it is versus Islam for a Muslim woman to worship in a temple, offer water, and follow Hindu rituals. Shariat does not indulge such actions. Nusrat Bharucha has single-minded a big crime. Razvi so-called that the actress had make-believe versus Islamic principles. According to them, this is a grave sin in the vision of Shariat, and they should repent from it.
“Repent and recite Istighafar.”
Maulana moreover said that Nusrat should repent in the Islamic way. She well-considered the actress to read Istighfar and Kalma Touba and express her regret publicly. Rajavi believes that without doing this, this installment will not end.
#WATCH | Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh: On Nusrat Bharucha's visit to Mahakal Temple, National President, All India Muslim Jamaat, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi says, "... Nusrat Bharucha visited the Mahakal Temple in Ujjain, where she performed puja rituals. According to Sharia,… pic.twitter.com/EpAfc0gaM4
— ANI (@ANI) December 31, 2025Why did the debate unravel out on social media?
The issue immediately gained momentum on social media. Some users say that religion is a personal matter and no one has the right to decide who can go where. While some people supported Maulana's statement and said that it is necessary to follow the norms of religion. Many people on Twitter are moreover raising the question of whether similar statements are made versus scripts like waffly religion while playing a role in films or why this protest happens only on visiting temples.
Is it an struggle to determine the morality of artists?
This controversy once then points towards the debate in which an struggle is made to determine the morality of artists, sportspersons, and public figures on the understructure of religious identity. Many experts say that such statements raise questions on religious freedom, personal choice, and self-rule of belief. At present, this issue has gone vastitude just a journey and has turned into a debate of religious intolerance versus personal freedom.
