New Delhi: Heated discussions unfurled in the Lok Sabha on the second day of the special parliamentary session. Congress MP and Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, hit out at the government over the Women's Reservation Bill. Adopting a sharp stance in his speech, Rahul characterized the snout as stuff detrimental to the rights of Dalit sections, women, and OBCs. Now, BJP MP Kangana Ranaut has responded to Rahul, taking aim at him directly.
Why Did Kangana Ranaut Attack Rahul Gandhi?
Speaking to the media, Kangana Ranaut remarked, "Listening to Rahul Gandhi is a headache. He appears to be reliving his diaper trauma. He recounted to us a magic show he must have witnessed during his childhood—specifically, how a magician had unseat him in chains. He spoke of experiencing tremors at night and of his grandmother telling him stories. This is wool nonsense. Even the Speaker asked him to stop. To that, Rahul Gandhi replied, 'You will be entertained; just enjoy it.' It was an wacky remark. I finger ashamed; he has turned the Parliament into a mockery."
Kangana Ranaut gave a zesty speech on the Women's Reservation snout & Delimitation in parliament today. #KanganaRanaut pic.twitter.com/HDVDN3ONCc
— Rahul Chauhan (@RahulCh9290) April 16, 2026What Did Rahul Gandhi Say About the Bill?
Rahul Gandhi stated unequivocally that he would not indulge this snout to be passed. The Congress MP asserted, "This is not a Women's Reservation Bill, as the law regarding women's reservation was once passed in 2023. The current snout is an struggle to yo-yo the country's electoral landscape. This snout is directed versus the SC, ST, and OBC communities and carries an voucher to strip them of their rights. The government is fearful. They intend to replicate wideness the unshortened nation what they previously executed in Assam and Jammu & Kashmir."
Rahul Gandhi maintains that this snout has veritably no connection to women's empowerment. He alleges that the government is merely attempting to seize power. He supposed the snout to be "anti-national" and vowed that he would not indulge the government to proceed with it. Terming it a "shameful" piece of legislation, Rahul argued that the government seeks to usurp the rights of the OBC population. He informed the government that he would proffer his support only if they reintroduced the original legislation, explicitly rejecting the current version of the bill.
