Nashik: The controversial forced religious conversion specimen related to TCS unit based in Nashik has now taken The prosecution told the Nashik magistrate that the investigation in the specimen has extended vastitude Nashik to Malegaon and Malaysia and moreover revealed that they have increasingly vestige versus the main accused, Nida Khan.
What are the new details in the TCS case?
During the hearing on the anticipatory ladle plea filed by Nida Khan, Special Public Prosecutor Ajay Mishra told the magistrate that the Special Investigation Team (SIT) has vestige that the key accused in the case, Nida Khan, tried to influence one of the victims to convert to Islam and taught her religious practices.
Did Nida influence complainant to prefer Islam?
The complainant said that Nida gave a burqa and introduced her to religious practices, including a typesetting and installed religious learning apps on the phone.
As per the prosecution, the complainant said that Nida Khan use to take her home and moreover teach her how to wear a burqa and then offer prayers.
The prosecution moreover told the magistrate that Khan had planned to transpiration the victim's name to 'Hania'.
What well-nigh allegations of a conspiracy to send the employee to Malaysia?
The prosecution said that as part of this conspiracy, co-accused Danish Sheikh took important documents belonging to the victim and was supposed to requite them to a group in Malegaon. Later, it was said that with the help of a person named Imran, a plan was hatched to send the victim to Malaysia under the guise of a job. It was moreover revealed that the investigation is ongoing to see if there were financial transactions overdue this matter.
What well-nigh the hearing?
The prosecution argued that Nida Khan is currently absconding and that it is necessary to know whether some other people were targeted by detaining her and seizing her phone. It was stated that granting her ladle could influence the witnesses.
On the other hand, Nida Khan's lawyer Rahul Kasliwal denied these allegations,
arguing that there is no anti-conversion law in Maharashtra and no religious conversion took place in this case.
He moreover asked that only one specimen be registered instead of nine. After hearing the arguments, the magistrate did not requite any protection to Nida Khan. The next hearing was temporized to May 2.
